Skip to main content

FROM IMPOSSIBLE TO POSSIBLE

Many people think it is impossible for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) to train their staff.  There are 5 key concerns:
·        “We don’t even have enough people to work, how to send them for training?” 
·        “My staff are very elderly with low education, how can they understand the training?” 
·        “Even if they can understand the training, how are they going to apply the training without our managers and bosses guiding them at the training?”
·        “If we send my staff to the Training Centres, who is going to cover their work? With so tight labour, we cannot afford to release them for two to three hours, how can they ever attend a two or three days training?”
·        “Even if the above concerns are addressed, the training will not be relevant and immediately useful for us because they are not customized and based on our company’s situation”

No wonder many people said that training is only for big companies as small companies (typically those with less than 20 staff) and micro companies (those with less than 10 staff) will simply see training as impossible.

This is despite the Singapore government’s Workforce Development Agency (WDA) is giving up to 90% course fee subsidy for courses under the Work Skills Qualification (WSQ) framework. On top of that, companies enjoy 60% cash back for the remaining 10% of course fees under Productivity and Innovation Credit (PIC).  Also, WDA will reimburse Absentee Payroll for up to 80% of the staff hourly salary (for hours while the staff is undergoing training), capped at $7.50 an hour.

In fact, after WDA’s 90% funding, PIC 60% funding for the remaining fee, plus Absentee Payroll, the net outlay for training is actually negative.  That is, the company makes money (get back more cash) from sending its staff for training under the WSQ framework.

Since training is actually cash flow positive for the SMEs, why aren’t they sending people for training?

As a trainer with over 28 years of working experience, plus over 15 years of working with numerous SMEs in 120 industries in Singapore and Malaysia, I believe that we need to tackle the top five concerns of SMEs in regards to training. 

Concern 1: “We don’t have enough people to work, how to send them for training?” 
By spreading the staff into several batches, we can rotate the staff for training, thereby ensuring that at any one time, there is always someone at work.  For example, if a company has 15 staff to train, it can break them up into 2 batches, with each batch made up of staff from different departments. With the staff also overseeing another department’s work, there is always someone at work even when staff are attending training.

Concern 2: My staff are elerly with low education, how can they understand the training?” 
We can get the Trainers to conduct the training in languages that the staff can understand, including the use of Malay, dialects and body language. For staff with lower education, instead of using long lectures, we use short video clips to explain the concepts, followed by experiential games and role plays.  In fact a company that we trained recently has a staff over 90 years old with less than primary education.  She told us that she can understand 90% of what are taught as the trainers use the above mentioned methods to teach. 

Concern 3: “Even if my staff can understand the training, how are they going to apply the training without we the managers and bosses guiding them at the training?”
Here we get the managers and bosses to be in the same class as the staff, and they will guide their staff on the application during the training.

Concern 4: “If I send my staff to the off-site Training Centre, who is going to cover their work? With so tight labour, I cannot even release them for two to three hours, how can we send them for a two to three days training?”
Our company only does in-house training, that is, your staff will not be away for work, for they will attend the training at their workplace.  There is zero travelling time and cost incurred.

Since we are conducting the training in-house on-site, our training schedule can be more flexible. For example, a 3-day course “Cultivate Workplace Relations” could be conducted over 6 half-days.  In this way, your company can get the staff trained without having to release them away from their work.

If there are any last minute operational issues that need to be addressed, the staff can attend to them by just taking a short break away from training.  In this way, training does not affect work at all.

Concern 5: “Even if the above concerns are addressed, the training will not be relevant and immediately useful for us because they are not customized and based on our company’s situation.  
Our company does only customized in-house training, therefore all our training are 100% customized to your company’s situation.  For example, in our “Respond to Service Challenge” training, we use real life cases as teaching material.  Our trainers will get the trainees to talk to a real customer and learn how to resolve a customer service challenge on the spot.

If you too want to turn training your staff from impossible to possible, now is the time. Engage a WDA certified trainer to conduct WSQ courses at your premise, 100% customized, and at a schedule that suits your operational needs.  Call us now at 6327-0543 or text to 8201-4347 now.  You can also visit www.loyalreliance.com


By Andy Ng, a Trainer with over 28 years of experience. Andy now specialises in promoting WDA’s WSQ courses covering the subjects of “Leadership and People Management”, “Service Excellence” and “Business Success Excellence”.  Email to Andy at hpa88@singnet.com.sg or text him at 8201-4347 now.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What an Executive Coach and Business Coach Does

The Secret Under the Mattress: Why would a 79-year Man Bet So Big on 4D?

It was 2007 when we discovered his secret. While moving my father’s mattress, we found them: heaps and heaps of Singapore Pools 4D tickets. They were stacked in layers, a paper trail of lost hopes. What shocked us most wasn’t just the volume, but the stakes. He wasn’t betting a few dollars for fun. He was punting hundreds of dollars per draw—nearly ten times a month. At the time, my siblings and I were furious. Our father was a 79-year-old retiree. We wondered, with a mix of anger and confusion, why a man at his stage of life would need to win such "big money." What was he going to do with the money? We saw it as a reckless habit, a sign of poor judgment in his final years.  Some of us would say, "If I were to give him money to buy 4D, why don't I use the money and buy 4D myself?  At least I have better discipline".  It has taken me two decades, and the experience of raising my own three grown-up children, to finally see the truth that was hidden under that matt...

Head Bleeding when the Chair Falls

The Weight of Silence: What Were We Really Arguing About? My earliest memories are punctuated by the sound of shouting. In 1970, when I was barely 6 years old, I stood as a small witness to the fierce quarrels between my father and my late eldest brother Kah Yang (he passed away in 1971 at the age of 17). As I grew up, these contradictions became the soundtrack of our lives, usually centered around our family's shoe shop and clothing stalls in Chinatown. In the court of family opinion, the verdict was almost always the same: my father was "wrong." He was judged as a man who didn't fulfill his role, who wasn't "burdening" enough for the family’s success. But as I look back from the vantage point of 2026, I have to ask: Was that actually true? Let me finally put to rest what my father did right: the truths that were buried under decades of criticism: Unseen Labor: He worked grueling, long hours. I remember him hauling boxes of goods and equipment to set u...