Skip to main content

How our Finance Minister Kill with a Borrowed Knife

Sun Tzu Art of War uses tactics to achieve maximum results with minimum resources.  One of the most used stratagem is "Kill with a Borrowed Knife" or 借刀杀人。Unknown to many people and unreported by the media, our Finance Minister Mr Tharman used this tactic in pushing the PIC (Productivity and Innovation Credit).

You see, Mr Tharman had a tall and challenging task.  How can Singapore 250,000 companies, of which over 95% are small and medium enterprises, reduce the reliance on cheap foreign labour and use higher skilled local staff and automation to increase productivity?  So he came up with the PIC scheme in 2010.

In 2012, Mr Tharman enhanced this scheme and increased the cash subsidy from 30% to 60%, payable quarterly instead of yearly.  But he has another problem: how can this scheme be pushed out quickly to the most number of SMEs without the government hiring a big public relations team?  The answer lies in making use of vendors.

You see, vendors doing training, IT Solutions, IT Hardware, Software and Automation Equipment can see huge payouts to their business if their clients invest in such PIC claimable items.  So these vendors (including we as training providers) are actually the knifes used by the Finance Minister.

Not only that, such vendors are also using the PIC scheme as a knife to 'kill' or close the sale.  And the companies that invest in PIC claimable expenditure are also using the PIC as a knife to achieve their goals: train their people, upgrade the IT and automate their businesses.

In short, everyone, from the Government to the Vendor and the claimant companies are all using the PIC as a knife to kill or achieve their goals. No wonder they say that such a tactic is the most used among the 36 Stratagems.  For when you try to kill someone with your own knife, people will be defensive. But when you borrow a knife from their friend, they will let their guard down as they doubt their friend will harm them.  So the key is to always borrow a tactic, a strategy, a tool, money or any resource that people perceive to be friendly, and then use this borrowed 'knife' to 'kill' or achieve your purpose.  This is what Facebook was doing: it used US$16 billion Facebook shares to buy over Whatsapp.  In short, kill with a borrowed knife is very effective.

By Andy Ng, whose courses on Sun Tzu Art of War are now done in 3 different areas: Sales, Leadership and People Management.  For details, click here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What an Executive Coach and Business Coach Does

The Secret Under the Mattress: Why would a 79-year Man Bet So Big on 4D?

It was 2007 when we discovered his secret. While moving my father’s mattress, we found them: heaps and heaps of Singapore Pools 4D tickets. They were stacked in layers, a paper trail of lost hopes. What shocked us most wasn’t just the volume, but the stakes. He wasn’t betting a few dollars for fun. He was punting hundreds of dollars per draw—nearly ten times a month. At the time, my siblings and I were furious. Our father was a 79-year-old retiree. We wondered, with a mix of anger and confusion, why a man at his stage of life would need to win such "big money." What was he going to do with the money? We saw it as a reckless habit, a sign of poor judgment in his final years.  Some of us would say, "If I were to give him money to buy 4D, why don't I use the money and buy 4D myself?  At least I have better discipline".  It has taken me two decades, and the experience of raising my own three grown-up children, to finally see the truth that was hidden under that matt...

Head Bleeding when the Chair Falls

The Weight of Silence: What Were We Really Arguing About? My earliest memories are punctuated by the sound of shouting. In 1970, when I was barely 6 years old, I stood as a small witness to the fierce quarrels between my father and my late eldest brother Kah Yang (he passed away in 1971 at the age of 17). As I grew up, these contradictions became the soundtrack of our lives, usually centered around our family's shoe shop and clothing stalls in Chinatown. In the court of family opinion, the verdict was almost always the same: my father was "wrong." He was judged as a man who didn't fulfill his role, who wasn't "burdening" enough for the family’s success. But as I look back from the vantage point of 2026, I have to ask: Was that actually true? Let me finally put to rest what my father did right: the truths that were buried under decades of criticism: Unseen Labor: He worked grueling, long hours. I remember him hauling boxes of goods and equipment to set u...