Skip to main content

Maximizing Your PIC Claims Legally

Note: PIC (Productivity and Innovation Credit) from IRAS gives companies 60% cash (maximum $60,000 yearly) when they invest in training and equipment.

To get the most from the government under PIC claims and yet don't cheat them and break the law, all companies can do the following 7 things: (to get your free iPhone 6 + worth $1,488 without paying, read this)
  1. Get a designated person in your company to be the PIC Leader, who will oversee all PIC claims.  This is because there is no such thing as auto pilot, more at here
  2. Learn from trainers how to maximise the PIC claims.  An example of a good course is here
  3. Go for cash payout instead of tax deduction, as this will give you more cash flow, allowing to invest more in PIC activities and claim even more in return
  4. Invest in PIC claimable equipment, like an automated door instead of a fancy door
  5. Invest in training, especially those training that increases your profits directly, in particular sales training.  
  6. Invest in training that make your staff do more with less, like management and leadership skills, work skills, motivational and emotional intelligence
  7. Invest in internal training and get $10,000 claims in every year. Details at here
In short, if you don't maximise your PIC claims, you are letting your competitors maximise their gains over you.  This is because smart companies will use the PIC claims to increase their competitiveness.  Related articles on PIC:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What an Executive Coach and Business Coach Does

The Secret Under the Mattress: Why would a 79-year Man Bet So Big on 4D?

It was 2007 when we discovered his secret. While moving my father’s mattress, we found them: heaps and heaps of Singapore Pools 4D tickets. They were stacked in layers, a paper trail of lost hopes. What shocked us most wasn’t just the volume, but the stakes. He wasn’t betting a few dollars for fun. He was punting hundreds of dollars per draw—nearly ten times a month. At the time, my siblings and I were furious. Our father was a 79-year-old retiree. We wondered, with a mix of anger and confusion, why a man at his stage of life would need to win such "big money." What was he going to do with the money? We saw it as a reckless habit, a sign of poor judgment in his final years.  Some of us would say, "If I were to give him money to buy 4D, why don't I use the money and buy 4D myself?  At least I have better discipline".  It has taken me two decades, and the experience of raising my own three grown-up children, to finally see the truth that was hidden under that matt...

Head Bleeding when the Chair Falls

The Weight of Silence: What Were We Really Arguing About? My earliest memories are punctuated by the sound of shouting. In 1970, when I was barely 6 years old, I stood as a small witness to the fierce quarrels between my father and my late eldest brother Kah Yang (he passed away in 1971 at the age of 17). As I grew up, these contradictions became the soundtrack of our lives, usually centered around our family's shoe shop and clothing stalls in Chinatown. In the court of family opinion, the verdict was almost always the same: my father was "wrong." He was judged as a man who didn't fulfill his role, who wasn't "burdening" enough for the family’s success. But as I look back from the vantage point of 2026, I have to ask: Was that actually true? Let me finally put to rest what my father did right: the truths that were buried under decades of criticism: Unseen Labor: He worked grueling, long hours. I remember him hauling boxes of goods and equipment to set u...