Skip to main content

You are Making Yourself Stupid If You Use AI to Help You Generate Answers

 

When AI became a popular plaything, something interesting happened.

People started to panic.

They worried about being eliminated by AI.

So many were forced to learn how to use it.

Humans upgraded their skills.

AI upgraded its capabilities.


Both sides were racing—

hoping not to be replaced.


But Sam Altman said something that completely changed the way I see this fear.

He said:

We don’t need to fear being surpassed by AI.

What we should fear is losing our curiosity.


But this curiosity is often misunderstood.

  • It’s not about liking new gadgets.
  • It’s not about chasing the latest technology.
  • It’s not about trying every new AI tool.

Real curiosity is this:

  • Are you still the one who decides what the problem is?
Before AI existed, human value was very clear.

If you knew the answer, you had value.

If you didn’t, you didn’t.

Knowledge was power.

Answers were currency.

We were always in a hurry—to know more, faster.

But AI broke that definition.

Today, one question doesn’t have one answer.

It has hundreds… even infinite answers.

So the problem is no longer a lack of answers.

The problem is a lack of meaning.

That’s why the future doesn’t belong to people who answer better.

It belongs to people who know why.


Why this question matters.

Why this direction is worth pursuing.

Why this answer should be trusted over another.


This is where Altman made a shocking statement:

99% of people are already being “multiplied” by AI.

Sounds terrifying, right?

But listen carefully—

he wasn’t warning us about AI replacing humans.

He was warning us about humans outsourcing their thinking.

He said something crucial:

No matter how powerful AI becomes, don’t let it distract your thinking.

If AI is only used to:

  • Write your weekly reports
  • generate articles
  • post content for you


Then something subtle happens.

Your output increases.

But your brain shrinks.


Your thinking becomes reactive, not intentional.

There was also a reflection shared by Jenson Huang of Nvidia, someone who uses AI every single day.

His conclusion was unexpected.

He said:

Using AI didn’t make my cognitive ability weaker.

It exposed whether my thinking was evolving or stagnant.


AI doesn’t decide your future.

It reveals it.

If you use AI to avoid thinking,

your thinking deteriorates.


If you use AI to challenge, test, and refine your judgment,

your thinking evolves faster than ever.

So the real dividing line in the AI era is not:

  • who is better at using AI
  • who produces more content
  • who learns faster tools

The real dividing line is this:

👉 Who still owns the problem definition?

AI can generate answers.

Only humans can define meaning.

AI can multiply effort.

Only humans can choose direction.

And curiosity, real curiosity, is the courage to keep asking:

“What is the right problem to solve?”

That is the one thing AI cannot take from you.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What an Executive Coach and Business Coach Does

Post a Comment
Read more

The Secret Under the Mattress: Why would a 79-year Man Bet So Big on 4D?

It was 2007 when we discovered his secret. While moving my father’s mattress, we found them: heaps and heaps of Singapore Pools 4D tickets. They were stacked in layers, a paper trail of lost hopes. What shocked us most wasn’t just the volume, but the stakes. He wasn’t betting a few dollars for fun. He was punting hundreds of dollars per draw—nearly ten times a month. At the time, my siblings and I were furious. Our father was a 79-year-old retiree. We wondered, with a mix of anger and confusion, why a man at his stage of life would need to win such "big money." What was he going to do with the money? We saw it as a reckless habit, a sign of poor judgment in his final years.  Some of us would say, "If I were to give him money to buy 4D, why don't I use the money and buy 4D myself?  At least I have better discipline".  It has taken me two decades, and the experience of raising my own three grown-up children, to finally see the truth that was hidden under that matt...
Post a Comment
Read more

Head Bleeding when the Chair Falls

The Weight of Silence: What Were We Really Arguing About? My earliest memories are punctuated by the sound of shouting. In 1970, when I was barely 6 years old, I stood as a small witness to the fierce quarrels between my father and my late eldest brother Kah Yang (he passed away in 1971 at the age of 17). As I grew up, these contradictions became the soundtrack of our lives, usually centered around our family's shoe shop and clothing stalls in Chinatown. In the court of family opinion, the verdict was almost always the same: my father was "wrong." He was judged as a man who didn't fulfill his role, who wasn't "burdening" enough for the family’s success. But as I look back from the vantage point of 2026, I have to ask: Was that actually true? Let me finally put to rest what my father did right: the truths that were buried under decades of criticism: Unseen Labor: He worked grueling, long hours. I remember him hauling boxes of goods and equipment to set u...
Post a Comment
Read more