Skip to main content

Most People Spend their Entire Lives Training to Win at Standardised Work

Most people spend their lives training to win at standardised work.

  • Clear rules.
  • Known answers.
  • Measurable benchmarks.

That is exactly the kind of work AI devalues first.

What remains valuable now is work that is:

– messy

– human

– ambiguous

– dependent on trust

– shaped by judgment, intuition, and meaning


Grades matter less.

IQ matters less.

Pure intelligence is becoming cheap.


AI is the engine.

Humans must provide the direction.


The winners won’t be the smartest.

They will be the ones who can:

• define the right problem

• ask better questions

• architect systems

• lead humans and machines together


When intelligence becomes cheap,

thinking is no longer the advantage.


Meaning is the advantage.

Direction is the advantage.

Leadership is the advantage.


That’s why Love Intelligence (LQ) matters.

  • LQ gives us meaning when answers multiply.
  • Direction when options explode.
  • Leadership when expertise alone is no longer enough.

With LQ, you don’t compete with AI —

you lead it.


And that’s why, in the AI era,

people don’t follow the smartest person in the room.

They follow the one who makes sense of what matters.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What an Executive Coach and Business Coach Does

The Secret Under the Mattress: Why would a 79-year Man Bet So Big on 4D?

It was 2007 when we discovered his secret. While moving my father’s mattress, we found them: heaps and heaps of Singapore Pools 4D tickets. They were stacked in layers, a paper trail of lost hopes. What shocked us most wasn’t just the volume, but the stakes. He wasn’t betting a few dollars for fun. He was punting hundreds of dollars per draw—nearly ten times a month. At the time, my siblings and I were furious. Our father was a 79-year-old retiree. We wondered, with a mix of anger and confusion, why a man at his stage of life would need to win such "big money." What was he going to do with the money? We saw it as a reckless habit, a sign of poor judgment in his final years.  Some of us would say, "If I were to give him money to buy 4D, why don't I use the money and buy 4D myself?  At least I have better discipline".  It has taken me two decades, and the experience of raising my own three grown-up children, to finally see the truth that was hidden under that matt...

Head Bleeding when the Chair Falls

The Weight of Silence: What Were We Really Arguing About? My earliest memories are punctuated by the sound of shouting. In 1970, when I was barely 6 years old, I stood as a small witness to the fierce quarrels between my father and my late eldest brother Kah Yang (he passed away in 1971 at the age of 17). As I grew up, these contradictions became the soundtrack of our lives, usually centered around our family's shoe shop and clothing stalls in Chinatown. In the court of family opinion, the verdict was almost always the same: my father was "wrong." He was judged as a man who didn't fulfill his role, who wasn't "burdening" enough for the family’s success. But as I look back from the vantage point of 2026, I have to ask: Was that actually true? Let me finally put to rest what my father did right: the truths that were buried under decades of criticism: Unseen Labor: He worked grueling, long hours. I remember him hauling boxes of goods and equipment to set u...