Even Pichai's Job Can be 80% Replaced by AI

Google CEO Pichai said that he did an AI query and was told that 80% of what he is doing now can be replaced by AI. Does this means that there is no point in climbing the corporate ladder as even an CEO job is not secure?

So Is There No Point Climbing the Corporate Ladder?

The ladder itself is changing.

In the past, promotion meant:
More knowledge
More control
More information

Now information is free.

The value of leadership shifts from:
“I know more” → to → “I can decide better.”

If your ambition is based on status, salary, title — yes, AI makes the ladder unstable.

If your ambition is based on:

Strategic judgement
Emotional steadiness
Ethical courage
Ability to unite people

Then your value increases, not decreases.

The Real Risk

The risk is not that CEO jobs disappear.

The risk is that middle layers built purely on coordination and reporting shrink dramatically.

AI compresses hierarchy.

Which means:
Fewer layers.
Higher expectations.
Greater emotional maturity required at the top.

The Strategic Insight

Climbing the ladder still matters.

But you must climb for the right reason:

Not to control information.
But to master judgement.

This is where your Love Intelligence framework becomes relevant.

AI improves IQ leverage.
AI improves data processing.

But leadership in the next decade will depend on:
Care under pressure.
Courage in ambiguity.
Connection across fear.

That is not programmable.

Comments

What an Executive Coach and Business Coach Does

The Secret Under the Mattress: Why would a 79-year Man Bet So Big on 4D?

It was 2007 when we discovered his secret. While moving my father’s mattress, we found them: heaps and heaps of Singapore Pools 4D tickets. They were stacked in layers, a paper trail of lost hopes. What shocked us most wasn’t just the volume, but the stakes. He wasn’t betting a few dollars for fun. He was punting hundreds of dollars per draw—nearly ten times a month. At the time, my siblings and I were furious. Our father was a 79-year-old retiree. We wondered, with a mix of anger and confusion, why a man at his stage of life would need to win such "big money." What was he going to do with the money? We saw it as a reckless habit, a sign of poor judgment in his final years. Some of us would say, "If I were to give him money to buy 4D, why don't I use the money and buy 4D myself? At least I have better discipline". It has taken me two decades, and the experience of raising my own three grown-up children, to finally see the truth that was hidden under that matt...

Head Bleeding when the Chair Falls

The Weight of Silence: What Were We Really Arguing About? My earliest memories are punctuated by the sound of shouting. In 1970, when I was barely 6 years old, I stood as a small witness to the fierce quarrels between my father and my late eldest brother Kah Yang (he passed away in 1971 at the age of 17). As I grew up, these contradictions became the soundtrack of our lives, usually centered around our family's shoe shop and clothing stalls in Chinatown. In the court of family opinion, the verdict was almost always the same: my father was "wrong." He was judged as a man who didn't fulfill his role, who wasn't "burdening" enough for the family’s success. But as I look back from the vantage point of 2026, I have to ask: Was that actually true? Let me finally put to rest what my father did right: the truths that were buried under decades of criticism: Unseen Labor: He worked grueling, long hours. I remember him hauling boxes of goods and equipment to set u...

Business and Money Tips

Search This Blog