Skip to main content

Sbortcut, not Cut Short, with First Principles Thinking

First Principles: The Shortcut Is Not Doing Less, But Doing Less Wrong

Why do some people work harder and harder, yet get further from what they want?

Because they are solving the symptom, not the cause.

When business is slow, cut prices.
When profits fall, raise prices.
When employees underperform, replace them.
When competitors attack, fight back.
When AI arrives, learn more AI.

But first-principles thinking asks a different question:

Strip away assumptions, habits and conventional wisdom. 
What truly determines the outcome?

That changes everything.
  1. Health is about respecting natural laws, not satisfying every desire.
  2. Wealth is about creating and circulating value, not accumulating numbers in a bank account.
  3. Getting things done is about focus, not busyness.
  4. Opportunity comes from seeing change before others do, not waiting for opportunity to knock.
  5. Competition is about differentiation, not confrontation. The best way to win is often to become difficult to replace. As Sun Tzu taught, the highest form of victory is winning without fighting.
  6. Success is about testing, learning and correcting—not waiting for perfection.
  7. Decision-making is not data versus intuition. It is evidence + judgment. Data tells us what happened. Judgment helps us decide what to do when the future remains uncertain.
  8. Strategy is about choice, not producing a thicker strategic plan. What will we do? Where will we win? And most importantly: What will we refuse to do?
  9. Profit is not simply about charging more or squeezing costs. Sustainable profit comes from creating greater customer value with fewer resources.
  10. Learning is about discovering the structure behind knowledge, not memorising answers. People who memorise answers solve yesterday's problems. People who understand principles can solve tomorrow's.
  11. And education should awaken thinking, not simply transfer information.
In the AI Era, Answers Are Cheap

AI can remember more than you. It can search faster than you. It can analyse more data than you. And increasingly, it can generate an answer before you have finished asking the question.

So perhaps the competitive advantage of the future is not knowing more answers.
It is knowing which questions to ask.

This is where seemingly different fields begin to converge.
  • The Yijing looks for the patterns behind change.
  • Sun Tzu looks for the conditions behind victory.
  • Love Intelligence (LQ) looks beneath human relationships to Care, Courage and Connection.
  • Corporate governance looks beyond numbers to judgment, trust and responsibility.
Different disciplines. Same principle:
Go beneath the surface. Find what truly drives the outcome.

Before asking: “What should I do?”
Ask:
  • “Why is this happening?”
  • “What really determines the result?”
  • “If I remove all assumptions, what remains fundamentally true?”
That is first-principles thinking.
And perhaps that is the real shortcut to success.

The shortcut is not walking less.
It is seeing clearly enough to walk less in the wrong direction.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Secret Under the Mattress: Why would a 79-year Man Bet So Big on 4D?

It was 2007 when we discovered his secret. While moving my father’s mattress, we found them: heaps and heaps of Singapore Pools 4D tickets. They were stacked in layers, a paper trail of lost hopes. What shocked us most wasn’t just the volume, but the stakes. He wasn’t betting a few dollars for fun. He was punting hundreds of dollars per draw—nearly ten times a month. At the time, my siblings and I were furious. Our father was a 79-year-old retiree. We wondered, with a mix of anger and confusion, why a man at his stage of life would need to win such "big money." What was he going to do with the money? We saw it as a reckless habit, a sign of poor judgment in his final years.  Some of us would say, "If I were to give him money to buy 4D, why don't I use the money and buy 4D myself?  At least I have better discipline".  It has taken me two decades, and the experience of raising my own three grown-up children, to finally see the truth that was hidden under that matt...

Head Bleeding when the Chair Falls

The Weight of Silence: What Were We Really Arguing About? My earliest memories are punctuated by the sound of shouting. In 1970, when I was barely 6 years old, I stood as a small witness to the fierce quarrels between my father and my late eldest brother Kah Yang (he passed away in 1971 at the age of 17). As I grew up, these contradictions became the soundtrack of our lives, usually centered around our family's shoe shop and clothing stalls in Chinatown. In the court of family opinion, the verdict was almost always the same: my father was "wrong." He was judged as a man who didn't fulfill his role, who wasn't "burdening" enough for the family’s success. But as I look back from the vantage point of 2026, I have to ask: Was that actually true? Let me finally put to rest what my father did right: the truths that were buried under decades of criticism: Unseen Labor: He worked grueling, long hours. I remember him hauling boxes of goods and equipment to set u...

You think 'Dear You' is Special? Wait till you watch 'Niu Lai'

The film is 《牛来》 (Niu Lai / The Cow Is Coming ) , an 86-minute Chinese animated film released on 5 August 2026. It was reportedly made by a mother-and-son team over 5 years, mostly hand-made, without sophisticated production technology or AI. The production cost is only RMB  1,680 . Initially, it was a disaster. In its first ten days, it reportedly earned only about RMB7,700 . The animation looked extremely crude, publicity was almost nonexistent, and it appeared destined to disappear. Then something extraordinary happened. The worse people said it was, the more people wanted to see it Pictures and clips began circulating online because the animation looked so amateurish. People mocked it. The mockery went viral. Instead of killing the movie, the criticism became its marketing campaign . People began thinking: “Can it really be THAT bad? I have to see this for myself.” Even cinemas reportedly posted unusually candid warnings about its rough production quality, effectively...