Skip to main content

Love is Not Just a Feeling but an Intelligence

For much of my life, I thought love was a feeling.

I thought love was something you felt when people appreciated you, supported you, or cared for you. I believed that if the feeling was strong enough, relationships would last, teams would work well together, and life would somehow fall into place.

But life taught me a different lesson.

Over nearly four decades of working with people, I saw intelligent leaders fail because they could not connect with others. I saw talented individuals lose opportunities because they lacked trust and influence. I saw families drift apart, not because there was no love, but because there was no understanding.

That experience forced me to reflect deeply. What was missing? Why do good people still hurt each other? Why do relationships break down even when both parties once cared?

The answer I discovered was simple, yet profound.

Love is not merely a feeling.

Feelings come and go. Some days we feel loving; other days we do not. If love is only a feeling, then it cannot be trusted to guide our decisions, our leadership, or our relationships.

I came to realize that love is actually an intelligence.

It is the intelligence to care when it is easier not to care.

It is the courage to do the right thing when it is uncomfortable or painful.

It is the ability to create genuine connection when misunderstanding, fear, or conflict stand in the way.

That realization became the foundation of Love Intelligence (LQ).

Since then, I have dedicated my life to helping people develop the three pillars of Love Intelligence: Care, Courage, and Connection.

I have seen managers become leaders, customers become loyal advocates, colleagues become trusted partners, and families rebuild relationships—not because they learned a new technique, but because they learned how to apply love intelligently.

Today, in an age where AI can generate content, write reports, and even imitate human conversations, I believe Love Intelligence matters more than ever.

Machines can process information.

But only humans can genuinely care.

Only humans can show courage.

Only humans can create authentic connection.

If there is one legacy I hope to leave behind, it is this:

I helped people understand that love is not just a feeling in the heart.

It is a practical intelligence for life, leadership, and success.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What an Executive Coach and Business Coach Does

The Secret Under the Mattress: Why would a 79-year Man Bet So Big on 4D?

It was 2007 when we discovered his secret. While moving my father’s mattress, we found them: heaps and heaps of Singapore Pools 4D tickets. They were stacked in layers, a paper trail of lost hopes. What shocked us most wasn’t just the volume, but the stakes. He wasn’t betting a few dollars for fun. He was punting hundreds of dollars per draw—nearly ten times a month. At the time, my siblings and I were furious. Our father was a 79-year-old retiree. We wondered, with a mix of anger and confusion, why a man at his stage of life would need to win such "big money." What was he going to do with the money? We saw it as a reckless habit, a sign of poor judgment in his final years.  Some of us would say, "If I were to give him money to buy 4D, why don't I use the money and buy 4D myself?  At least I have better discipline".  It has taken me two decades, and the experience of raising my own three grown-up children, to finally see the truth that was hidden under that matt...

Head Bleeding when the Chair Falls

The Weight of Silence: What Were We Really Arguing About? My earliest memories are punctuated by the sound of shouting. In 1970, when I was barely 6 years old, I stood as a small witness to the fierce quarrels between my father and my late eldest brother Kah Yang (he passed away in 1971 at the age of 17). As I grew up, these contradictions became the soundtrack of our lives, usually centered around our family's shoe shop and clothing stalls in Chinatown. In the court of family opinion, the verdict was almost always the same: my father was "wrong." He was judged as a man who didn't fulfill his role, who wasn't "burdening" enough for the family’s success. But as I look back from the vantage point of 2026, I have to ask: Was that actually true? Let me finally put to rest what my father did right: the truths that were buried under decades of criticism: Unseen Labor: He worked grueling, long hours. I remember him hauling boxes of goods and equipment to set u...