Skip to main content

Whose Sustainability Are We Sustaining? Transport Fares Up by 7%

How to Have Financial Sustainability When Costs Rise More Than Wage Increase?

Singapore’s recent public transport fare increase provides a useful lesson about financial sustainability, not only for transport operators, but for every one of us.

From 27 December 2026, public transport fares will increase by 7% overall. The Public Transport Council explained that the adjustment reflects factors including wage, energy and other operating costs. At the same time, the Government is providing additional subsidies to moderate the increase for commuters.

Why?

One reason is financial sustainability.

But that raises another question:

If public transport needs higher fares because its costs are rising, what happens to commuters whose own costs are rising faster than their wages?

What is Financial Sustainability?

Financial sustainability is not simply having enough money today.

It means:

Having sufficient recurring income and resources to meet your recurring costs over the long term, without continually depleting what you have.

For a transport system, if wages, energy, maintenance and other costs keep increasing while revenues remain unchanged, eventually the financial model comes under pressure.

But exactly the same principle applies to individuals.

Suppose your salary rises by 3%, but your overall cost of living rises by 5%.

You may be earning more dollars, yet becoming financially less sustainable.

You can cut expenses, but only up to a point.

You cannot keep eating less, travelling less and sacrificing more every year.

Eventually, cost-cutting itself becomes unsustainable.

So How Do We Become Financially Sustainable?

There are three fundamental levers:

Spend better. Eliminate waste and distinguish between what creates value and what merely consumes money.

Earn better. If costs continually rise faster than income, increasing earning capacity becomes essential—through skills, productivity, career progression, business or additional sources of income.

Build resilience. Savings and prudent investing can create buffers so that every unexpected expense does not become a crisis.

But there is a bigger lesson here.

Whose Sustainability Are We Sustaining?

If a transport operator becomes financially sustainable simply by continuously charging commuters more, while commuters' incomes cannot keep pace, the sustainability problem has not disappeared.

Part of it has merely been transferred from one party to another.

This is why genuine sustainability must look at the whole ecosystem.

For public transport, that includes operators, workers, commuters, taxpayers and government.

For companies, it includes shareholders, employees, customers, suppliers and society.

And for individuals, it means balancing today's needs with tomorrow's financial security.

True financial sustainability cannot simply mean passing our rising costs to someone else.

It means continually finding better ways to create more value than the resources we consume.

Perhaps that is the most important question we should ask whenever someone talks about sustainability:

“Whose sustainability are we sustaining?”

Because if my sustainability continuously makes you less sustainable, sooner or later, neither of us will be sustainable.

Written by Andy Ng, Financial Governance & Strategy Advisor

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Secret Under the Mattress: Why would a 79-year Man Bet So Big on 4D?

It was 2007 when we discovered his secret. While moving my father’s mattress, we found them: heaps and heaps of Singapore Pools 4D tickets. They were stacked in layers, a paper trail of lost hopes. What shocked us most wasn’t just the volume, but the stakes. He wasn’t betting a few dollars for fun. He was punting hundreds of dollars per draw—nearly ten times a month. At the time, my siblings and I were furious. Our father was a 79-year-old retiree. We wondered, with a mix of anger and confusion, why a man at his stage of life would need to win such "big money." What was he going to do with the money? We saw it as a reckless habit, a sign of poor judgment in his final years.  Some of us would say, "If I were to give him money to buy 4D, why don't I use the money and buy 4D myself?  At least I have better discipline".  It has taken me two decades, and the experience of raising my own three grown-up children, to finally see the truth that was hidden under that matt...

Head Bleeding when the Chair Falls

The Weight of Silence: What Were We Really Arguing About? My earliest memories are punctuated by the sound of shouting. In 1970, when I was barely 6 years old, I stood as a small witness to the fierce quarrels between my father and my late eldest brother Kah Yang (he passed away in 1971 at the age of 17). As I grew up, these contradictions became the soundtrack of our lives, usually centered around our family's shoe shop and clothing stalls in Chinatown. In the court of family opinion, the verdict was almost always the same: my father was "wrong." He was judged as a man who didn't fulfill his role, who wasn't "burdening" enough for the family’s success. But as I look back from the vantage point of 2026, I have to ask: Was that actually true? Let me finally put to rest what my father did right: the truths that were buried under decades of criticism: Unseen Labor: He worked grueling, long hours. I remember him hauling boxes of goods and equipment to set u...

You think 'Dear You' is Special? Wait till you watch 'Niu Lai'

The film is 《牛来》 (Niu Lai / The Cow Is Coming ) , an 86-minute Chinese animated film released on 5 August 2026. It was reportedly made by a mother-and-son team over 5 years, mostly hand-made, without sophisticated production technology or AI. The production cost is only RMB  1,680 . Initially, it was a disaster. In its first ten days, it reportedly earned only about RMB7,700 . The animation looked extremely crude, publicity was almost nonexistent, and it appeared destined to disappear. Then something extraordinary happened. The worse people said it was, the more people wanted to see it Pictures and clips began circulating online because the animation looked so amateurish. People mocked it. The mockery went viral. Instead of killing the movie, the criticism became its marketing campaign . People began thinking: “Can it really be THAT bad? I have to see this for myself.” Even cinemas reportedly posted unusually candid warnings about its rough production quality, effectively...