Skip to main content

AI Is Taking Over Human Actors: Sustainable or Not?

AI Is Taking Over Human Actors. Is This the End of Acting as We Know It?

AI is no longer just helping filmmakers write scripts, edit videos or create special effects.

It can now generate realistic-looking actors, voices, facial expressions and entire performances, without hiring a human actor for every role.

For producers, this creates enormous opportunities to reduce costs and experiment creatively.

For human actors, however, it raises an uncomfortable question:

If AI can perform my role at a fraction of the cost, why would anyone continue hiring me?

But there is an even bigger question for the entertainment industry:

If replacing human actors makes filmmaking cheaper, does it necessarily make the industry more sustainable?

Not necessarily. AI can improve financial performance while creating new challenges involving employment, consent, intellectual property, audience trust and the long-term development of creative talent.

The real-world warning: AI actress Tilly Norwood

In 2025, the unveiling of Tilly Norwood sparked controversy in Hollywood.

The actors' union SAG-AFTRA publicly opposed replacing human performers with synthetic actors, raising concerns about consent, compensation and livelihoods. 

By June 2026, Hollywood's actors had ratified a new agreement strengthening protections around AI-generated performers and digital replicas. 

What does this mean for sustainability and governance?

My view is that AI will increasingly replace certain acting tasks, especially in advertising, background performances and lower-budget productions. But replacing all human actors is a much bigger claim, and not an established reality.

For boards and business leaders, three questions matter:

  1. People: Are we creating new opportunities while protecting human creativity and livelihoods?
  2. Performance: Are we producing genuinely better entertainment, or simply cheaper content?
  3. Governance: Do we have consent, fair compensation, transparency and appropriate intellectual-property protections?

This leads to an important principle:

AI can reduce the cost of producing entertainment. But reducing costs is not the same as creating sustainable value.

And it connects with Love Intelligence (LQ). Audiences do not merely consume moving images. They connect with stories, meaning and human experiences.

The future may not belong to AI actors replacing human actors, but to human creators who use AI to tell stories that were previously impossible.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Secret Under the Mattress: Why would a 79-year Man Bet So Big on 4D?

It was 2007 when we discovered his secret. While moving my father’s mattress, we found them: heaps and heaps of Singapore Pools 4D tickets. They were stacked in layers, a paper trail of lost hopes. What shocked us most wasn’t just the volume, but the stakes. He wasn’t betting a few dollars for fun. He was punting hundreds of dollars per draw—nearly ten times a month. At the time, my siblings and I were furious. Our father was a 79-year-old retiree. We wondered, with a mix of anger and confusion, why a man at his stage of life would need to win such "big money." What was he going to do with the money? We saw it as a reckless habit, a sign of poor judgment in his final years.  Some of us would say, "If I were to give him money to buy 4D, why don't I use the money and buy 4D myself?  At least I have better discipline".  It has taken me two decades, and the experience of raising my own three grown-up children, to finally see the truth that was hidden under that matt...

Head Bleeding when the Chair Falls

The Weight of Silence: What Were We Really Arguing About? My earliest memories are punctuated by the sound of shouting. In 1970, when I was barely 6 years old, I stood as a small witness to the fierce quarrels between my father and my late eldest brother Kah Yang (he passed away in 1971 at the age of 17). As I grew up, these contradictions became the soundtrack of our lives, usually centered around our family's shoe shop and clothing stalls in Chinatown. In the court of family opinion, the verdict was almost always the same: my father was "wrong." He was judged as a man who didn't fulfill his role, who wasn't "burdening" enough for the family’s success. But as I look back from the vantage point of 2026, I have to ask: Was that actually true? Let me finally put to rest what my father did right: the truths that were buried under decades of criticism: Unseen Labor: He worked grueling, long hours. I remember him hauling boxes of goods and equipment to set u...

You think 'Dear You' is Special? Wait till you watch 'Niu Lai'

The film is 《牛来》 (Niu Lai / The Cow Is Coming ) , an 86-minute Chinese animated film released on 5 August 2026. It was reportedly made by a mother-and-son team over 5 years, mostly hand-made, without sophisticated production technology or AI. The production cost is only RMB  1,680 . Initially, it was a disaster. In its first ten days, it reportedly earned only about RMB7,700 . The animation looked extremely crude, publicity was almost nonexistent, and it appeared destined to disappear. Then something extraordinary happened. The worse people said it was, the more people wanted to see it Pictures and clips began circulating online because the animation looked so amateurish. People mocked it. The mockery went viral. Instead of killing the movie, the criticism became its marketing campaign . People began thinking: “Can it really be THAT bad? I have to see this for myself.” Even cinemas reportedly posted unusually candid warnings about its rough production quality, effectively...