Skip to main content

《给阿嬷的情书》没有一句孙子,却处处有孙子

《给阿嬷的情书》不是在“讲”《孙子兵法》,而是在“活出”《孙子兵法》。

电影里没有战场、没有将军、没有兵器,但处处都是人与人之间如何面对利益、冲突、距离、误解和选择。这恰恰是《孙子兵法》更深层的智慧。

1. 不战而胜:最高明的胜利,不需要打败任何人
孙子的最高境界并不是“百战百胜”,而是不战而屈人之兵。

《给阿嬷的情书》里面的人物,很多时候都没有选择争、抢、逼、拆穿。
淑柔没有用冲突解决感情;南枝与木生之间也没有因为复杂的关系而互相占有;许多人物选择的是克制、成全、等待和承担。

真正的赢,不是我赢你输,而是关系没有输。

这就是“Win Without Fighting”。

2. 知己知彼:先看懂人,才知道应该怎么做
很多人把“知己知彼,百战不殆”理解成研究竞争对手。

但放在人际关系和领导力中,它更深:
知己——知道自己的欲望、恐惧、能力与界限。
知彼——理解别人的处境、需要、难处与选择。

《给阿嬷的情书》感人的地方,就是人物慢慢从“我想要什么”,走向“我终于明白你为什么这样做”。

所以,知己知彼不是为了打败别人,而是为了减少不必要的战争。

3. 致人而不致于人:不让环境决定你成为谁
孙子说:“善战者,致人而不致于人。”

真正厉害的人,不是被别人、金钱、情绪和环境牵着走,而是拥有自己的主动权。

这也正好呼应《给阿嬷的情书》一个很深的主题:
金钱可以改变你拥有什么,
爱却决定你成为什么样的人。

小伟可以被金钱驱动;木生、南枝、淑柔等人却一次次面对自己的选择。
外面的局势未必由我们决定,但我们可以决定自己用什么方式回应。

《孙子兵法》不是一本教人打仗的书,而是把华人几千年来“如何做人、如何处世、如何面对冲突”的智慧写成了兵法。

《给阿嬷的情书》没有一句孙子,却处处有孙子。

孙子兵法不在战场,而在人心。
《给阿嬷的情书》没有战争,却活出了“不战而胜”。
这也可以成为一个很好的文章/视频主题:
《给阿嬷的情书》原来是一部《孙子兵法》电影
没有战争,没有敌人,却处处都是“不战而胜”的智慧。

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What an Executive Coach and Business Coach Does

The Secret Under the Mattress: Why would a 79-year Man Bet So Big on 4D?

It was 2007 when we discovered his secret. While moving my father’s mattress, we found them: heaps and heaps of Singapore Pools 4D tickets. They were stacked in layers, a paper trail of lost hopes. What shocked us most wasn’t just the volume, but the stakes. He wasn’t betting a few dollars for fun. He was punting hundreds of dollars per draw—nearly ten times a month. At the time, my siblings and I were furious. Our father was a 79-year-old retiree. We wondered, with a mix of anger and confusion, why a man at his stage of life would need to win such "big money." What was he going to do with the money? We saw it as a reckless habit, a sign of poor judgment in his final years.  Some of us would say, "If I were to give him money to buy 4D, why don't I use the money and buy 4D myself?  At least I have better discipline".  It has taken me two decades, and the experience of raising my own three grown-up children, to finally see the truth that was hidden under that matt...

Head Bleeding when the Chair Falls

The Weight of Silence: What Were We Really Arguing About? My earliest memories are punctuated by the sound of shouting. In 1970, when I was barely 6 years old, I stood as a small witness to the fierce quarrels between my father and my late eldest brother Kah Yang (he passed away in 1971 at the age of 17). As I grew up, these contradictions became the soundtrack of our lives, usually centered around our family's shoe shop and clothing stalls in Chinatown. In the court of family opinion, the verdict was almost always the same: my father was "wrong." He was judged as a man who didn't fulfill his role, who wasn't "burdening" enough for the family’s success. But as I look back from the vantage point of 2026, I have to ask: Was that actually true? Let me finally put to rest what my father did right: the truths that were buried under decades of criticism: Unseen Labor: He worked grueling, long hours. I remember him hauling boxes of goods and equipment to set u...