Skip to main content

人还是利润?胖东来证明:两者可以兼得

 

人还是利润?胖东来证明:两者可以兼得

很多企业以为:对员工好,就会牺牲利润;要赚更多钱,就必须压低人工、提高毛利。

胖东来却走了另一条路。

它给员工较好的薪酬、假期和福利,不追求把每一分钱的利润都榨出来,同时坚持商品品质与顾客服务。结果并不是“对人好却赚不到钱”,而是形成一个正向循环:

善待员工 → 员工善待顾客 → 顾客产生信任 → 生意更好 → 企业持续盈利。

这其实非常符合《孙子兵法》。

一、道:先赢人心,再赢市场

孙子曰:“道者,令民与上同意也。”

真正强大的组织,不只是靠制度管人,而是让上下同心。

当员工感受到尊重、公平和关怀,他们自然更愿意把这种善意传递给顾客。

赢得员工的心,才更容易赢得顾客的心。

二、不战而胜:不要掉进价格战

很多零售企业不断打价格战:压供应商、压工资、减人手、降成本。

结果大家都很累,利润也未必更好。

胖东来却选择了另一个战场——不只是比谁更便宜,而是比信任、品质、服务和人情味。

这正是孙子的智慧:

最高明的竞争,不是比别人打得更狠,而是让自己根本不需要打同一场战争。

三、致人而不致于人:重新制定游戏规则

孙子曰:“善战者,致人而不致于人。”

不要永远跟着竞争者走,要创造自己的优势,让别人开始研究你、学习你。

胖东来没有接受传统零售业“低工资+低价格+高周转”的唯一逻辑,而是创造另一套逻辑:

好待遇+好员工+好服务+高信任
= 顾客忠诚+长期利润。

所以,People vs Profits(人还是利润)本身可能就是一个错误的问题。

真正高明的战略应该问:

“我如何通过善待人,创造更大的利润?”

这才是《孙子兵法》真正厉害的地方。

孙子不是教我们如何把对手打败,
而是教我们如何创造“不必打,也能赢”的条件。

胖东来先赢员工,再赢顾客,最后赢得利润。

人心与利润,不一定是二选一。

最好的战略,是让人心成为利润的来源。

这,就是胖东来的**《孙子兵法》之道:不战而胜。**

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What an Executive Coach and Business Coach Does

The Secret Under the Mattress: Why would a 79-year Man Bet So Big on 4D?

It was 2007 when we discovered his secret. While moving my father’s mattress, we found them: heaps and heaps of Singapore Pools 4D tickets. They were stacked in layers, a paper trail of lost hopes. What shocked us most wasn’t just the volume, but the stakes. He wasn’t betting a few dollars for fun. He was punting hundreds of dollars per draw—nearly ten times a month. At the time, my siblings and I were furious. Our father was a 79-year-old retiree. We wondered, with a mix of anger and confusion, why a man at his stage of life would need to win such "big money." What was he going to do with the money? We saw it as a reckless habit, a sign of poor judgment in his final years.  Some of us would say, "If I were to give him money to buy 4D, why don't I use the money and buy 4D myself?  At least I have better discipline".  It has taken me two decades, and the experience of raising my own three grown-up children, to finally see the truth that was hidden under that matt...

Head Bleeding when the Chair Falls

The Weight of Silence: What Were We Really Arguing About? My earliest memories are punctuated by the sound of shouting. In 1970, when I was barely 6 years old, I stood as a small witness to the fierce quarrels between my father and my late eldest brother Kah Yang (he passed away in 1971 at the age of 17). As I grew up, these contradictions became the soundtrack of our lives, usually centered around our family's shoe shop and clothing stalls in Chinatown. In the court of family opinion, the verdict was almost always the same: my father was "wrong." He was judged as a man who didn't fulfill his role, who wasn't "burdening" enough for the family’s success. But as I look back from the vantage point of 2026, I have to ask: Was that actually true? Let me finally put to rest what my father did right: the truths that were buried under decades of criticism: Unseen Labor: He worked grueling, long hours. I remember him hauling boxes of goods and equipment to set u...