Skip to main content

The Niu Lai Effects: What the “Worst Movie” Teaches Us About Humanity and Value

The Niu Lai Effects: What the “Worst Movie” Teaches Us About Humanity and Value

How does a movie go from almost nobody watching it to more than RMB50 million at the box office?

That is the extraordinary story of Niu Lai (《牛来》).

Released on 5 August 2026, the crudely animated movie earned only RMB3,420 on its opening day and about RMB7,169 over its first nine days. By 14 August, it was close to disappearing from cinemas.

Then something strange happened.

People started mocking it, talking about it, creating memes around it, and most importantly, buying tickets to experience it for themselves.

By 29 August, Niu Lai had crossed RMB50 million, with around 1.8 million admissions. Recent reporting says the box office has continued to rise, with forecasts around RMB60–64 million.

How could something criticised for being so crude become so valuable?

I call this The Niu Lai Effects.

1. The Imperfection Effect

We have been taught that better quality creates better results.

Niu Lai challenges that assumption.

Its crude animation became part of its attraction. People wanted to see for themselves just how unusual it was.

There is an important human truth here:

Perfection impresses us; imperfection can involve us.

When everything is polished, we become spectators. But when something is obviously imperfect, we notice the human beings behind it. We laugh. We comment. We debate. We share.

This becomes even more significant in the AI era.

As AI makes polished content increasingly abundant, authenticity and genuine human imperfection may actually become more valuable.

AI can produce perfection. 

But perfection alone doesn't necessarily produce connection.

2. The Meaning Effect

People don't just buy products. They buy stories and meaning.

Think about what many people were really buying when they purchased a Niu Lai ticket. Were they buying sophisticated animation? Obviously not.

They were buying the ability to say:

“I watched it myself.”

They wanted to understand the phenomenon, participate in the joke and experience the story everyone else was discussing.

The product was the movie.

But the meaning surrounding the movie became part of the product.

This applies to almost every business. Customers don't merely buy what we make. They buy what it means to them.

3. The Connection Effect

Human beings want to belong. Once Niu Lai became a social phenomenon, watching it was no longer an individual act.

People laughed together. They created memes. They shared reviews. They told their friends. They participated in an ongoing conversation.

The producers created the movie.

But the audience created the phenomenon.

This is an important distinction.

The greatest value of a product may not always reside inside the product itself. Sometimes value emerges from the connections and community surrounding it.

That's why I believe: Perfection gets attention. Humanity creates connection.

4. The Invisible Value Effect

Look at Niu Lai purely from the perspective of traditional resources and you might struggle to explain its success.

But look at its intangible assets, and the picture changes.

Its unusual story. The mother-and-son creative journey. The courage to put an extremely unconventional production into cinemas.

  • Authenticity.
  • Curiosity.
  • Social participation.
  • Belonging.
  • Earned publicity.

Yet they helped generate tens of millions of RMB in box-office revenue.

That gives us a powerful business lesson:

Not everything valuable appears on the balance sheet.

Human beings can give enormous value to something that initially had very little perceived value.

We don't merely discover value.

Sometimes, we create it.

5. The Sustainability Effect

But there is a dangerous lesson we should not take from Niu Lai:

“Quality doesn't matter.” It does.

Nor should businesses conclude: “Let's create something terrible. Maybe it will go viral!”

The Niu Lai phenomenon was unusual precisely because it was unusual.

Novelty can generate attention. Curiosity can generate sales. Virality can generate extraordinary short-term momentum.

But: Virality is not the same as sustainable competitive advantage.

You cannot build a long-term strategy on novelty alone.

Humanity and imperfection can attract attention. Substance and quality sustain value.

And here lies a subtle lesson for business leaders, strategists and boards.

When something suddenly becomes enormously successful, don't merely ask:

“How much money did we make?”

Ask:

Why did it work?

Can it be repeated?

What could destroy this value?

And how can we make the value last?

That is where strategy quietly meets good governance.

The Real Niu Lai Effect

So don't copy Niu Lai. Understand Niu Lai.

Its biggest lesson is not that a crude movie can make RMB50 million.

Its bigger lesson is what human beings can do to value.

  • We can transform imperfection into attention.
  • Attention into participation.
  • Participation into connection.
  • Connection into meaning.
  • And meaning into economic value.

But the final challenge is always the hardest:

Can we make that value last?

That, to me, is The Niu Lai Effect:

Imperfection → Meaning → Connection → Value → Sustainability

AI will continue to become better at creating perfect outputs.

But perhaps our competitive advantage in the AI era is not becoming more perfect than machines. It is becoming more human.

AI can create perfection. Humans create meaning.

And wise leaders turn meaning into sustainable value.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What an Executive Coach and Business Coach Does

The Secret Under the Mattress: Why would a 79-year Man Bet So Big on 4D?

It was 2007 when we discovered his secret. While moving my father’s mattress, we found them: heaps and heaps of Singapore Pools 4D tickets. They were stacked in layers, a paper trail of lost hopes. What shocked us most wasn’t just the volume, but the stakes. He wasn’t betting a few dollars for fun. He was punting hundreds of dollars per draw—nearly ten times a month. At the time, my siblings and I were furious. Our father was a 79-year-old retiree. We wondered, with a mix of anger and confusion, why a man at his stage of life would need to win such "big money." What was he going to do with the money? We saw it as a reckless habit, a sign of poor judgment in his final years.  Some of us would say, "If I were to give him money to buy 4D, why don't I use the money and buy 4D myself?  At least I have better discipline".  It has taken me two decades, and the experience of raising my own three grown-up children, to finally see the truth that was hidden under that matt...

Head Bleeding when the Chair Falls

The Weight of Silence: What Were We Really Arguing About? My earliest memories are punctuated by the sound of shouting. In 1970, when I was barely 6 years old, I stood as a small witness to the fierce quarrels between my father and my late eldest brother Kah Yang (he passed away in 1971 at the age of 17). As I grew up, these contradictions became the soundtrack of our lives, usually centered around our family's shoe shop and clothing stalls in Chinatown. In the court of family opinion, the verdict was almost always the same: my father was "wrong." He was judged as a man who didn't fulfill his role, who wasn't "burdening" enough for the family’s success. But as I look back from the vantage point of 2026, I have to ask: Was that actually true? Let me finally put to rest what my father did right: the truths that were buried under decades of criticism: Unseen Labor: He worked grueling, long hours. I remember him hauling boxes of goods and equipment to set u...